Online Discussions: The Effect of Having Two Deadlines

ID: 31970 Type: Full Paper
  1. Michael Herrick, Meng-Fen Grace Lin, and Charlotte Huei-Wen, University of Hawaii, Taiwan

Wednesday, March 9 2:00-2:30 PM Location: Oaklands

Presider: Ronald McBride, Northwestern State University of Louisiana, Retired, Current Status: Adjunct, United States

Abstract: Discussion forums are the heart of asynchronous online courses; many factors go into their design. After witnessing students delay in making required discussion board posts until just before the deadline, the authors postulated that a two-deadline solution, one in which initial responses were due days before peer comments, would serve to better incite dialogue among the students. The discussion forums of 5 groups, 3 with one-deadline and 2 with two-deadlines, were analyzed quantitatively; number of posts, response level, number of days before the deadline, and number of words were used as metrics. Findings revealed statistically significant differences between the one- and two-deadline groups in regards to average number of student posts and average number of posts at Response Level 2. Additionally, factors such as uneven teaching presence and varied instructor strategies might have impacted the outcome. Better facilitation of conversations in online courses belies trivial solutions.


Conference attendees are able to comment on papers, view the full text and slides, and attend live presentations. If you are an attendee, please login to get full access.