A Revised Replication Study Typology and A Call for Participation: Replication Studies involving Technology and Teacher Education

  1. Natalie Milman, George Washington University, United States
  2. Rhonda Christensen, University of North Texas, United States
  3. J. Michael Spector, University of North Texas, United States
  4. Robert Branch, University of Georgia, United States
  5. Denise Schmidt-Crawford, Iowa State University, United States
  6. Charles Hodges, Georgia Southern University, United States
  7. Arlene Borthwick, National Louis University, United States
  8. Melanie Shoffner, Purdue University, United States
  9. Gerald Knezek, University of North Texas, United States
  10. David Rutledge, New Mexico State University, United States
  11. Meghan Manfra, North Carolina State University, United States

Wednesday, March 23 4:15 PM-5:15 PM

No presider for this session.

In this session panelists will define what replication studies are, explain why they are needed, and invite researchers to conduct multi-site replication studies of technology and teacher education using common methods and measures. Additionally, panelists will share a revised replication study typology for describing the types of replication studies researchers may wish to complete, as well as solicit critique and feedback of the revised typology. Participants will engage with panelists in small groups to critique the revised typology, discuss targeted areas of replication research, and determine next steps for moving the call for participation to one of action.

ID
48077
Type
Panel
Topic
Research & Evaluation
Conference attendees are able to comment on papers, view the full text and slides, and attend live presentations. If you are an attendee, please login to get full access.